Both of the same name, and unfortunately, my son has
developed some of the same obsessive behavior that I have displayed over the
six plus decades of my life. It’s
either a 100% or 0% mentality.
David is now 36 years old, single and is in unbelievable shape thanks to
his physical conditioning and marathon and ultra-marathon running
schedule. He is an elite athlete
by any definition with his best marathon running event coming close to a 2:30
finish at this last years Chicago Marathon. Unfortunately, escaping injury from all of the risky
training, the running and biking through traffic and unfinished trails, he now
finds himself with a “potentially serious knee injury” from a fall yesterday at
the Big White Ski Resort in Canada.
The injury seems to be localized to the medial aspect of his right knee,
just where the medial meniscus is located. What is the relevance of this other than the obvious?
When I was 36 years old, I ran my only marathon (1982), but
didn’t enjoy it and was injured for about 3 months because of pushing myself
too hard and not being prepared through proper training. It basically taught me a lesson. My work schedule did not allow the type
of consistent training that was necessary…. I worked too hard, and too many
hours and too many nights on call to be able to dedicate the necessary time to
my hobbies. I also played tennis
and thus diverted my entire attention to being a weekend warrior at the Kailua
Racquet Club…… spending as much time as possible, playing as many sets as the
day would allow and sustaining a progressive knee injury that perhaps had its
origin in my marathon folly. When
it was all said and done, after ignoring the repetitive knee swelling injury in
my right knee for 3-4 years, in 1986 at the age of 40, I had an arthroscopic
procedure to remove a piece of torn cartilage from the medial meniscus of my
right knee. I recovered over
the next two years, but my right knee is still not quite as strong as my left
knee.
My son’s injury brings back the eerie memory of my own
injury as well as the obvious similarities of our past. It strengthens the argument for the
effect of heredity and destiny and weakens the notion of the world acting
through random motion; something I professed to believe was the main conductor
of all of the events in the universe.
No comments:
Post a Comment